Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections Outside the Intensive Care Unit: A 2-Year Analysis

Authors

  • Aslıhan Candevir Çukurova University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Adana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-516X
  • Behice Kurtaran Çukurova University Medical School, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Department, Adana Türkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-4664
  • Ferit Kuşçu Çukurova University Medical School, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Department, Adana Türkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-8305
  • Süheyla Kömür Çukurova University Medical School, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Department, Adana Türkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-559X
  • Filiz Kibar Çukurova University Medical School, Microbiology Department, Adana Türkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-2399
  • Damla Ertürk University of Health Sciences Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, İzmir, Türkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2163-5844
  • Ayşe Seza İnal Çukurova University Medical School, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Department, Adana Türkiye https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-7164
  • Yeşim Taşova Çukurova University Medical School, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Department, Adana Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37609/srinmed.2

Keywords:

Central venous catheter, Central line, Infection rate, Non-intensive care unit

Abstract

Objective: There is limited data on the rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in non-intensive care units (ICU). Our aim was to determine the rates and features of CLABSI in non-ICU units.

Method: CLABSI surveillance is performed according to CDC criteria in Internal Medicine Nephrology, Pediatric/Adult Hematology, Oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) units. Hospital infections control committee surveillance data was used.

Results: Totally, 70028 patient days(pd) and 22358 catheter days, 101 infections were detected in 94 patients. The CLABSI rate was 1.44/1000 pd, the incidence density was 4.2/1000 catheter days, and the device utilization rate was 0.32. The highest infection rate was observed in the adult HSCT unit (15.18/1000 pd). 56.4% of the patients were male (n=53) and the mean age of the patients was 32±2.5 years. The mean length of hospitalization was 27.7±2.5 days. Half of the patients (n=47) had permanent central lines.  Hematologic cancer was found in 54.7% and hemodialysis in 19.2%. 21.8% of infections were polymicrobial. Of the 125 microorganisms isolated, 61.6% were Gram negative, 20.8% were fungi and 17.6% were Gram positive. The most frequent pathogen was E.coli (13.6%) followed by and K.pneumoniae (13.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (8%) and C.parapsilosis (7.2%). Crude mortality was 36.2%. Colistin and amikacin were the most effective antibiotics in E.coli and K.pneumoniae, oxacillin resistance was 60% in S. aureus. In Candida species, fluconazole resistance was 15.8%.

Conclusion: CLABSI can also be seen outside intensive care units and surveillance in these units is necessary for infection control.

References

Erdem HA, Si̇pahi̇ OR, Kepeli̇ N, Di̇ki̇ş D, Küçükler ND, Ulusoy B, et al. Point prevalence of hospital-acquired

infections in Ege university hospital. Mediterr J Infect Microbes Antimicrob [Internet]. 2015;4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mjima.2015.12

Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory

Committee. JAMA [Internet]. 1995;274(8):639–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.274.8.639

Blot SI, Depuydt P, Annemans L, Benoit D, Hoste E, De Waele JJ, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes in critically ill patients with nosocomial catheter-related bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2005;41(11):1591–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/497833

Rosenthal VD, Al-Abdely HM, El-Kholy AA, AlKhawaja SAA, Leblebicioglu H, Mehta Y, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary of 50 countries for 2010-2015: Device associated module. Am J Infect Control [Internet]. 2016;44(12):1495–504. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.007

Çetinkaya Şardan Y, Güner R, Çakar N, Ağalar F, Bolaman Z, Yavaşoğlu İ, et al. Damar İçi Kateter İnfeksiyonlarının Önlenmesi Kılavuzu. Hastane İnfeksiyonları Dergisi. 2013;17(2):233–79.

Kallen AJ, Patel PR, O’Grady NP. Preventing catheter related bloodstream infections outside the intensive care unit: expanding prevention to new settings. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2010;51(3):335–41. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653942

Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control [Internet]. 2008;36(5):309–32. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 5 Million Lives Campaign. Last access date: 30.11.2022. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/ihi/programs/campaign.

Climo M, Diekema D, Warren DK, Herwaldt LA, Perl TM, Peterson L, et al. Prevalence of the use of central venous access devices within and outside of the intensive care unit: results of a survey among hospitals in the prevention epicenter program of the Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2003;24(12):942–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/502163

Zingg W, Sax H, Inan C, Cartier V, Diby M, Clergue F, et al. Hospital-wide surveillance of catheter-related bloodstream infection: from the expected to the unexpected. J Hosp Infect [Internet]. 2009;73(1):41–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.05.015

Tokars JI, Richards C, Andrus M, Klevens M, Curtis A, Horan T, Jernigan J, Cardo D. The changing face of surveillance for health care-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(9):1347-52.

Vonberg R-P, Behnke M, Geffers C, Sohr D, Ruden H, Dettenkofer M, et al. Device-associated infection rates for non-intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2006;27(4):357–61. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/503339

Ulusal Sağlık Hizmeti İlişkili Enfeksiyonlar Sürveyans Ağı Özet Raporu 2019. Last access date: 30.11.2022. Available at: https://www.saglikaktuel.com/d/file/ushesa_ozet_raporu_2019.pdf.

Aminzadeh Z, Simpson P, Athan E. Central venous catheter associated blood stream infections (CVCBSIs) in the non-intensive care settings: Epidemiology, microbiology and outcomes. Infect Dis Health [Internet]. 2019;24(4):222–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2019.07.003

Saliba P, Hornero A, Cuervo G, Grau I, Jimenez E, García D, et al. Mortality risk factors among non-ICU patients with nosocomial vascular catheter-related bloodstream infections: a prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect [Internet]. 2018;99(1):48–54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.11.002

Baier C, Linke L, Eder M, Schwab F, Chaberny IF, Vonberg RP, Ebadi E. Incidence, risk factors and healthcare costs of central line-associated nosocomial bloodstream infections in hematologic and oncologic patients. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227772.

Lendak D, Puerta-Alcalde P, Moreno-García E, Chumbita M, García-Pouton N, Cardozo C, et al. Changing epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neutropenic oncohematological patients. PLOS ONE. 2021 Apr 30;16(4). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251010

Chaftari AM, Hachem R, Jiang Y, Shah P, Hussain A, Hamal ZA, et al. Changing epidemiology of catheter related bloodstream infections in cancer patients. Infection Control; Hospital Epidemiology. 2018 May 17;39(6):727–9. doi:10.1017/ice.2018.75

Braun E, Hussein K, Geffen Y, Rabino G, Bar-Lavie Y, Paul M. Predominance of gram-negative bacilli among patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2014 Oct;20(10). doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12565

Downloads

Published

2024-06-06

How to Cite

Candevir, A., Kurtaran, B., Kuşçu, F., Kömür, S., Kibar, F., Ertürk, D., … Taşova, Y. (2024). Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections Outside the Intensive Care Unit: A 2-Year Analysis. Scientific Reports in Medicine, 1(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.37609/srinmed.2

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Scientific Reports in Medicine

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice
Scientific Reports in Medicine is an open access scientific journal. Open access means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
Scientific Reports in Medicine requires the author as the rights holder to sign and submit the journal's agreement form prior to acceptance. The authors transfer all financial rights, especially processing, reproduction, representation, printing, distribution, and online transmittal to Academician Publishing with no limitation whatsoever, and grant Academician Publishing for its publication. This ensures both that The Journal has the right to publish the article and that the author has confirmed various things including that it is their original work and that it is based on valid research.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
*Authors transfer copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
*Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Self Archiving Policy
*The Journal allows authors to self-archive their articles in an open access repository. The Journal considers publishing material where a pre-print or working paper has been previously mounted online. The Journal does not consider this an exception to our policy regarding the originality of the paper (not to be published elsewhere), since the open access repository doesn't have a publisher character, but an archiving system for the benefit of the public.

The Journal's policy regarding the accepted articles requires authors not to mention, in the archived articles in an open access repository, their acceptance for publication in the journal until the article is final and no modifications can be made. Authors are not allowed to submit the paper to another publisher while is still being evaluated for the Journal or is in the process of revision after the peer review decision.

The Journal does allow the authors to archive the final published article, often a pdf file, in an open access repository, after authors inform the editorial office. The final version of the article and its internet page contains information about copyright and how to cite the article. Only this final version of the article is uploaded online, on the Journal's official website, and only this version should be used for self-archiving and should replace the previous versions uploaded by authors in the open access repository.